Radiation protection of the natural environment. Review

"Radiation and Risk", 2018, vol. 27, No. 3, pp.113-131

DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2018-27-3-113-131

Authors

Kryshev I.I. – Chief Researcher, D. Sc., Phys.-Math., Prof. Research and Production Association “Typhoon”, Obninsk. Contacts: 4 Pobedy str., Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia, 249038. Tel.: +7 (484) 397-16-89: e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
Sazykina T.G. – Chief Researcher, D. Sc., Phys.-Math. Research and Production Association “Typhoon”, Obninsk.

Abstract

We witness expanding the scientific basis of radiation protection of the natural environment. International databases to collect radiobiological effects on the non-human biota studied in many laboratories around the world, including Russia, were developed. Unique results of long-term radiobiological effects on the biota in territories of Russia contaminated with radionuclides were added to the international database FREDERICA (www.frederica-online.org). Concept of threshold effect of ionizing radiation on the biota was scientifically proven. Criteria for radiation safety of the natural ecosystems were developed as a result of experimental data examination. Standard models for assessment of dose-rates to referent non-human species were developed. Research into modeling radioecological effects on the non-human biota is carried out. Methodology for assessment of economical loss due to exposure of the natural ecosystem to radiation was developed. Radiotoxicity of alpha-emitters was found to be higher as compared with gamma ray-emitters. The method for assessment of ecological risk was tested in wide range of specific areas, such as territories contaminated with radionuclides as a result of the Kyshtym and Chernobyl accidents, areas in which Russian NPPs, radiochemical plants, and uranium production facilities are located. Regulatory documents and guidelines of assessment of radioecological effects, estimation of reference concentration of radioactive substances according to ecological criteria and measurement of background were developed. Despite the advances in radiation protection, a lot of scientific questions, such as necessity to use alpha radiation quality factor for doses to non-human biota, development of more detailed "dose-effect" scale for natural species belonged to different groups by reference to specific features of their metabolism; simulation and experimental study of ecological processes for estimating economical loss and population recovery following exposure to radiation; research into biological effects of ecological stressors other than radiation, need to be studied.

Key words
Radiation protection, environment, ionizing radiation, biota, radioecological effects, dose, models, criteria for radiation safety, ecological risk, nuclear energy installations.

References

9. Guiding principles on the development and establishment of standards for maximum permissible air emissions of radioactive substances. Approved by Rostechnadzor 7.11.2012, N 639. Moscow, Rostechnadzor, 2012. 21 p. (In Russian).

10. Guidance for developing the standards of maximum permissible releases of radionuclides in water bodies by water users. Approved by Rostechnadzor 22.12.2016, N 551. Moscow, Rostechnadzor, 2016. 25 p. (In Russian).

11. Guidance МТ 1.2.1.15.1176-2016. Development and approval of the standards for maximum permissible air emissions of radioactive substances by nuclear power plants. Moscow, AO «Concern Rosenergoatom», 2016. 76 p. (In Russian).

12. Kryshev I.I., Sazykina T.G. Radiation safety of the environment: request for harmonization of Russian and international regulation documents with consideration of Federal laws and new International Basic Safety Standards. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2013, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47-61. (In Russian).

13. Recommendations R 52.18.820-2015. Assessment of radiation and environmental impacts on natural environment based on radiation monitoring data. Approved by the Russian Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, Roshydromet 17.04.2015. Obninsk, 2015. 60 p. (In Russian).

14. Recommendations R 52.18.852-2016. Estimation procedure for control levels of radionuclide content in marine waters. Approved by the Russian Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, Roshydromet, 17.08.2016. Procedures for estimating the radionuclide control levels in environmental objects. Obninsk, 2016, pp. 3-28. (In Russian).

15. Recommendations R 52.18.853-2016. Estimation procedure for control levels of radionuclide content in fresh water and soils. Approved by the Russian Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, Roshydromet, 17.08.2016. Procedures for estimating the radionuclide control levels in environmental objects. Obninsk, 2016, pp. 29-55. (In Russian).

16. Recommendations R 52.18-863-2017. Guidance for estimating the radiation background levels based on radiation monitoring data. Approved by the Russian Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmen-tal Monitoring, Roshydromet, 29.05.2017. Obninsk, 2017. 35 p. (In Russian).

17. Practical recommendations on the issues of radiation impact assessment for humans and biota. Eds.: I.I. Linge, I.I. Kryshev. Moscow, SAM poligrafist, 2015. 265 p. (In Russian).

18. Radioecological situation in the regions of ROSATOM facilities. Eds.: I.I. Linge, I.I. Kryshev. Moscow, SAM poligrafist, 2015. 296 p. (In Russian).

19. Zhuravskaya A.N. Biological effects of small doses of ionizing radiation (review). Nauka i obrazovaniye – Science and Education, 2016, no. 2, pp. 94-102. (In Russian).

20. Udalova A.A. About dose-effect relationship in the environment radiation protection. Radiatsionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya – Radiation Biology. Radioecology, 2015, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 520-538. (In Russian).

21. Aleksakhin R.M. Topical ecological problems of nuclear energy. Atomnaya energiya – Atomic Energy, 2013, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 243-249. (In Russian).

22. Aleksakhin R.M., Fesenko S.V. Radiation protection of the environment: anthropocentric and ecocentric principles. Radiatsionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya – Radiation Biology. Radioecology, 2004, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 93-103. (In Russian).

23. Kazakov S.V., Linge I.I. On hygienic and ecological approaches in radiation protection. Radiatsionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya – Radiation Biology. Radioecology. 2004, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 482-492. (In Russian).

24. Panov A.V., Sanzharova N.I., Geraskin S.A., Perevolotskaya T.V., Gordienko E.V., Mikhailova R.A. Survey of international approaches to ensuring radiation safety of the public and environment during remediation of radioactively contaminated sites of former nuclear fuel cycle facilities. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2016, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 86-103. (In Russian).

25. Panov A.V., Sanzharova N.I., Perevolotski A.N., Perevolotskaya T.V., Naumov V.S. Analysis of the cur-rent national system of radiation safety of public and radiation protection of environment nearby facilities and sites outside the facilities, contaminated with artificial and natural radionuclides due to their past operation. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2017, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 107-121. (In Russian).

26. Abalkina I.L., Panchenko S.V., Savkin M.N., Vedernikova M.V., Kryshev I.I. Socially and ecologically acceptable criteria for rehabilitation of contaminated territories at disposal sites of special radioactive wastes. Problemy radiatsionnoj bezopasnosti – Problems of Radiation Safety, 2017, no. 3, pp. 46-52. (In Russian).

27. Kryshev I.I., Kryshev A.I., Panchenko S.V., Vedernikova M.V. Remediation criteria for radioactively con-taminated nuclear sites. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2018, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 33-42. (In Russian).

28. Kryshev I.I., Kuryndina L.A., Linge I.I. Evaluation of environmental damage due to nuclear power. Аtomnaya energiya – Atomic Energy, 2014, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 159-164. (In Russian).

29. Sazykina T.G., Kryshev A.I. EPIC database on the effects of chronic radiation in fish: Russian/FSU data. J. Environ. Radioact., 2003, vol. 68, no. 1. pp. 65-87.

30. Sazykina T.G., Kryshev I.I. Radiation effects in wild terrestrial vertebrates – the EPIC collection. J. Environ. Radioact., 2006, vol. 88, no. 1. pp. 11-48.

31. Copplestone D., Hingston J., Real A. The development and purpose of the FREDERICA radiation effects database. J. Environ. Radioact., 2008, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1456-1463.

32. International radiobiology archives of long-term animal studies. Vol. 1. Description of participating institutions and studies. Washington, 1996. 486 p.

33. Birschwilks M., Gruenberger M., Adelmann C., Tapio S., Gerber G., Schofield P.N., Grosche B. The European radiobiological archives: online access to data from radiobiological experiments. Radiat. Res., 2011, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 526-531.

34. Brown J.E., Alfonso B., Avila R., Beresford N.A., Copplestone D., Hosseini A. New version of the ERICA tool to facilitate impact assessments of radioactivity on wild plants and animals. J. Environ. Radioact., 2016, vol. 153, pp. 141-148.

35. IAEA. Effects of ionizing radiation on plants and animals at levels implied by current radiation protection standards. Technical Report. Series No 332. Vienna, 1992. 334 p.

36. US DOE. United States Department of Energy. A graded approach for evaluating radiation doses to aquatic and terrestrial biota. DOE-STD-1153-2002.U.S.DOE. Washington DC, 2002. 234 p.

37. Highley K.A., Kocher D.C., Real A.G., Chambers D.B. Relative biological effectiveness and radiation weighting factors in the context of animals and plants. Ann. ICRP, 2012, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 233-245.

38. Sazykina T.G., Kryshev A.I. Lower thresholds for lifetime health effects in animals from high-LET radiation – comparison with chronic low-LET radiation. J. Environ. Radioact., 2016, vol. 165, pp. 227-242.

39. Sazykina T.G., Kryshev A.I., Sanina K.D. Non-parametric estimation of thresholds for radiation effects in vertebrate species under chronic low-LET exposures. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 2009, vol. 48, pp. 391-404.

40. Alonzo F., Hertel-Aas T., Real A., Lance E., Garcia-Sanchez L., Bradshaw C., Vives i Batlle J., Oughton D., Garnier-Laplace J. Population modelling to compare chronic external radiotoxicity between individual and population endpoints in four taxonomic groups. J. Environ. Radioact., 2016, vol. 152, pp. 46-59.

41. Kryshev A.I., Sazykina T.G. Modelling the effects of ionizing radiation on survival of animal population: acute versus chronic exposure. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 2015, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 103-109.

42. Modelling of biota dose effects. Report of working group 6 Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety (EMRAS II) Programme. IAEA-TECHDOC-1737. Vienna, IAEA, 2014.

43. Monte L. Predicting the effects of ionising radiation on biological populations: testing of a non-linear Leslie model applied to a small mammal population. J. Environ. Radioact., 2013, vol. 122, pp. 63-69.

44. Sazykina T.G. Population sensitivities of animals to chronic ionizing radiation – model predictions from mice to elephants. J. Environ. Radioact., 2018, vol. 182, pp. 177-182.

45. Sazykina T.G., Kryshev,A.I. Simulation of population response to ionizing radiation in ecosystem with a limiting resource – model and analytical solutions. J. Environ. Radioact., 2016, vol. 151, pp. 50-57.

46. Vives i Batlle J., Sazykina T., Kryshev A., Monte L., Kawaguchi I. Inter-comparison of population models for the calculation of radiation dose effects on wildlife. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 2012, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 399-410.

47. NCRP, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Effects of ionizing radiation on aquatic organisms. NCRP Report N 109. Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 1991. 115 p.

48. UN, United Nations. Effects of radiation on the environment. UNSCEAR 2008. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. Vol. II, Scientific Annex E. Effect of ionizing radiation on non-human biota. New York, United Nations, 2011. 164 p.

49. Garnier-Laplace J., Copplestone D., Gilbin R. Issues and practices in the use of effects data from FREDERICA in the ERICA integrated approach. J. Environ. Radioact., 2008, vol. 99, pp. 1474-1483.

50. Kryshev I.I., Sazykina T.G., Kryshev A.I. Testing the radioecological criteria for environmental protection on the areas of South-Ural radioactive trace and locations of nuclear energy facilities. Radioecological Readings dedicated to Academician V.M. Klechkovsky (30 November, 2017). Obninsk, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology, 2017, pp. 29-58. (In Russian).

51. Kryshev I.I., Ryazantsev E.P. Environmental risk of the radiological accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima (Japan) NPPs. Atomnaya energiya – Atomic Energy, 2017, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 46-55. (In Russian).

Full-text article (in Russian)