Assessment of effectiveness of the proton-neutron and neutron-proton exposure with additional neutron and proton doses splitting on tumor cells in vitro

«Radiation and Risk», 2025, vol. 34, No. 3, pp.74-85

DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2025-34-3-74-85

Authors

Koryakina E.V. – Sen. Researcher, C. Sc., Biol. Contacts: 4 Korolev str., Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia, 249035. Tel.: +7(484) 399-70-13, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
Pichkunova А.А. – Engineer
Troshina M.V. – Researcher
Potetnya V.I. – Sen. Researcher, C. Sc., Biol.
Saburov V.O. – Researcher, acting Head of Lab
Litun E.V. – Engineer
Golovanova O.Yu. – Engineer-physicist
Lychagin A.A. – Lead. Researcher, C. Sc., Phys.-Math.
Koryakin S.N. – Head of Dep., C. Sc., Biol. A. Tsyb MRRC.
A. Tsyb MRRC, Obninsk

Abstract

The search for new ways to increase the effectiveness of combined radiation therapy of radioresistant tumors remains an urgent task. One of the promising areas is the use of a combination of protons and neutrons instead of photon-neutron irradiation. The purpose of this work was to study the effectiveness of combined proton-neutron exposure to Chinese hamster tumor cells (B14-150, fibrosar-coma). Proton irradiation was performed on the proton therapy complex “Prometheus”, neutron irradiation – on the portable neutron generator NG-14, located at the A. Tsyb MRRC. The combined effect was carried out in the “protons→neutrons” and “neutrons→protons” modes with the proton and neutron components splitted into 2-4 fractions with intervals of 1 h. The contribution of neutrons to the total dose was 30%. Cell survival after all studied schemes of combined irradiation manifested the synergistic effect. Doses splitting of both neutrons and protons resulted in significant decrease in the effectiveness of exposure. Only neutron dose splitting led to no statistically significant differences between the studied irradiation schemes. However, the sequence “neutrons→protons» showed a tendency of increasing cell survival with the increase in the number of neutron dose fractions. The observed patterns indicate the important role of the spatiotemporal distribution of damage induced by protons and neutrons, their number, complexity, and interaction during the repair process.

Key words
fast neutrons, protons, combined exposure, dose splitting, tumor cells, fibrosarcoma, cell survival, radiobiology.

References

1. Mardynsky Y.S. The place of neutron therapy in the treatment of malignant neoplasms. Meditsinskaya fizika – Medical Physics, 2001, no. 9, pp. 37-39. (In Russian).

2. Mardynsky Y.S., Gulidov I.А., Aminov G.G., Ragulin Yu.А., Sysoev А.S. Mixed (photon-neutron) therapy in complex treatment for locally advanced breast cancer. Voprosy oncologii – Problems in Oncology, 2014, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 490-493. (In Russian).

3. Gulidov I.A., Mardynsky Y.S., Smirnova I.A., Sysoev A.S., Aminov G.G. Combined photon-neutron the-rapy in the complex treatment of patients with stage III-IV breast cancer. Sibirskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Oncology, 2004, no. 2-3, pp. 66-69. (In Russian).

4. Sarycheva M.M., Vazhenin A.V., Mozerova E.Ya., Lozhkov A.A., Karabut R.Yu., Maksimovskaya A.Yu., Timohina D.M., Sabelnikova Zh.E. Neutron radiation therapy in the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma. Sibirskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Oncology, 2021, vol. 20, no. 2. pp. 77-84. (In Russian).

5. Gribova О.V., Musabaeva L.I., Choinzonov Е.L., Novikov V.А., Lisin V.А. The use of fast neutrons in treatment of malignant tumors of the head and neck. Voprosy oncologii – Problems in Oncology, 2015, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 149-153. (In Russian).

6. Lukina Ye.Yu., Vazhenin A.V., Kuznetsova A.I., Mokichev G.V., Munasipov Z.Z., Bobkova G.G. The role of fast neutrons in treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Voprosy oncologii – Problems in Oncology, 2010, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 408-412. (In Russian).

7. Lukina Ye.Yu., Vazhenin A.V., Kuznetsova A.I., Munasipov Z.Z., Mokichev G.V., Ricovanov G.N., Bobkova G.G. End-results of combined photon-neutron radiotherapy of malignant tumors of salivary gland at the Urals neutron therapy center. Voprosy oncologii – Problems in Oncology, 2010, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 413-416. (In Russian).

8. Sarycheva M.M., Vazhenin A.V., Domozhirova A.S. Modern approaches to the treatment of patients with progression of primary glial brain tumors. Nepreryvnoe medicinskoe obrazovanie i nauka – Continuous Medical Education and Science, 2022, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 50-61. (In Russian).

9. Mardynsky Y.S., Gulidov I.А., Gordon K.B., Koryakin S.N., Solovev A.N., Saburov V.O., Ivanov S.A., Kaprin A.D., Lobzhanidze T.K., Markov N.V., Zheleznov I.M., Yurkov D.I., Gerasimchuk O.A., Presnya-kov A.Yu., Zverev V.I., Smirnov V.P. External-beam neutron therapy: the first domestic medical unit. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk – Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 80-86. (In Russian).

10. Obaturov G.M., Potetnya V.I. Combined effect of radiation of different quality. Atomnaya energiya – Atomic Energy, 1998, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 41-47. (In Russian).

11. van de Water T.A., Lomax A.J., Bijl H.P., de Jong M.E., Schilstra C., Hug E.B., Langendijk J.A. Potential benefits of scanned intensity-modulated proton therapy versus advanced photon therapy with regard to sparing of the salivary glands in oropharyngeal cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2011, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1216-1224.

12. Klimanov V.A., Galjautdinova J.J., Zabelin M.V. Proton radiotherapy: current status and future prospects. Part 2. Radiobiological and clinical aspects. Onkologicheskiy zhurnal: luchevaya diagnostika, luchevaya terapiya – Journal of Oncology: Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy, 2019, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5-20. (In Russian).

13. Koryakin S.N., Troshina M.V., Koryakina E.V., Potetnya V.I., Pichkunova А.А., Saburov V.O., Kazakov E.I., Lychagin A.A., Ivanov S.A., Kaprin A.D., Zverev V.I., Presnyakov A.Yu. The study of effectiveness of combined proton-neutron irradiation of tumor cells in vitro. Byulleten′ eksperimental′noy biologii i meditsiny – Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2024, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 75-78. (In Russian).

14. Freshney R.J. Culture of animal cells. A manual of basic technique. Moscow, BINOM, 2010. 691 p. (In Russian).

15. Lychagin A.A., Koryakina E.V., Ulianenko S.E. Some features of dosimetry and radiobiological reactions of impulse neutron irradiation. Meditsinskaya fizika – Medical Physics, 2015, vol. 67, no 3, pp. 15-23. (In Russian).

16. Koryakina E.V., Potetnya V.I., Troshina M.V., Efimova M.N., Baykuzina R.M., Koryakin S.N., Lychagin A.A., Pikalov V.A., Ulyanenko S.E. Comparison of the biological efficiency of accelerated carbon ions and heavy recoils in Chinese hamster cells. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2019, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 96-106. (In Russian).

17. Orlov A.I. Statistical hypothesis testing of homogeneity of mathematical expectations of two independent samples: Cramer-Welch test instead of t-test. Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta – Polythematic Online Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University, 2015, no. 110, pp. 197-218. (In Russian).

18. Caswell R.S. Coyne J.J., Randolph M.Z. Kerma factors for neutron energies below 30 MeV. Radiat. Res., 1980, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 217-254.

Full-text article (in Russian)