Issues
Comparative analysis of radiological risks for personnel during the normal operation of the BREST-OD-300 reactor and risks from other adverse environmental factors of a non-radiation nature
«Radiation and Risk», 2025, vol. 34, No. 1, pp.5-13
DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2025-34-1-5-13
Authors
Ivanov V.K. – Scientific Advisor of NRER, Chief Radioecologist of Project PRORYV, Chairman of RSCRP, Corresponding Member of RAS, D. Sc., Tech., Prof.Menyajlo A.N. – Lead. Researcher, C. Sc., Biol.
Korelo A.M. – Sen. Researcher
Chekin S.Yu. – Head of Lab. Contacts: 4 Korolyov str., Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia, 249035. Tel.: (484) 399-30-79; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
Karpenko C.V. – Engineer; Kashcheeva P.V. – Sen. Researcher, C. Sc., Biol. A. Tsyb MRRC.
Solomatin V.M. – Head of Dep. of the Chief Radioecologist, Project “Proryv”, C. Sc., Biol. JSC “Proryv”.
1 Joint Stock Company “Proryv”, Moscow
2 A. Tsyb MRRC, Obninsk
Abstract
Currently, within the framework of the “Proryv” Project, a pilot demonstration energy complex based on the BREST-OD-300 reactor unit is being developed at the industrial site of JSC “Siberian Chemical Combine” (JSC “SChC”). This complex will allow testing nuclear energy technologies of the new generation with a closed nuclear fuel cycle. The key issue in this project is ensuring the safety of personnel. This includes protection from both radiation and non-radiation carcinogenic risk factors. This article presents a comparative analysis of carcinogenic risks for JSC “SChC” employees from exposure to both radiation and man-made environmental factors. According to the data from the radiation risk monitoring system of Rosatom State Corporation in 2022, the average carcinogenic risk for JSC “SChC” employees was 2.7x10-5 year-1, which meets the requirements of the Radiation Safety Standards (NRB-99/2009). It has been shown that the carcinogenic risks from exposure to non-radiation factors are significantly higher than those associated with occupational exposure, and exceed the limit of 2x10-4 year-1, which is set by NRB-99/2009 for workers in situations of potential exposure. Atmospheric air pollution in Seversk, with harmful chemicals like suspended particles, lead, and formaldehyde, contributes most to the carcinogenic risks for workers at JSC “SChC”. These findings are significant for developing a comprehensive strategy to protect JSC “SChC's” staff from the effects of human-made carcinogens and to reduce the incidence of related cancers.
Key words
JSC “SChC” personnel, employee safety, carcinogenic risk, radiation factor, non-radiation factor, atmospheric air pollution, soil contamination, carcinogenic risk models, lifetime attributable risk, radiobiology, environmental and occupational health.
References
1. Ivanov V.K., Korelo A.M., Panfilov A.P., Raikov S.V. ARMIR: System for optimization of radiological protec-tion of personnel. Moscow, Pero Publ. House, 2014. 302 p. (In Russian).
2. Publication 103 of the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP). Eds.: M.F. Kiselev, N.K. Shandala. Moscow, LLC PKF "Alana," 2009. 312 pp. Available at: http://www.icrp.org/docs/P103_Rus-sian.pdf (Accessed 14.01.2025). (In Russian).
3. Preston D.L., Kusumi S., Tomonaga M., Izumi S., Ron E., Kuramoto A., Kamada N., Dohy H., Matsuo T., Nonaka H., Thompson D.E., Soda M., Mabuchi K. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III: Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950-1987. Radiat. Res.,1994, vol. 137, pp. 68-97.
4. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2006 Report Vol. I, Annex A: Epidemiological studies of radiation and cancer. New York, United Nation, 2008.
5. Radiation safety standards (NRB-99/2009). Sanitary rules and regulations. SanPiN 2.6.1.2523-09. Moscow, Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2009. 100 p. (In Russian).
6. Ozasa K., Shimizu Y., Suyama A., Kasagi F., Soda M., Grant E.J., Sakata R., Sugiyama H., Kodama K. Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 14, 1950-2003: an overview of cancer and noncancer diseases. Radiat. Res., 2012, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 229-243.
7. Ilin L.A., Samoilov A.S., Tsovyanov A.G., Shinkarev S.M., Shandala N.K., Gantsovsky P.P., Karev A.E., Kukhta B.A., Simakov A.V., Klochkov V.N., Korenkov I.P., Lyaginskaya A.M., Parinov O.V., Ivanov V.K., Chekin S.Yu., Menyailo A.N., Tumanov K.A., Solomatin V.M., Izmestyev K.M. Radiation-hygienic investigations of experimental production of mixed nitride uranium-plutonium fuel at JSC SChC. Part 2: Doses and risks. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost’ – Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety, 2022, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 39-45. (In Russian).
8. Guidelines for the assessment of public health risk from exposure to chemical substances polluting the envi-ronment. Moscow, Federal Centre of Gossanepidnadzor of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 2004. 143 p. (In Russian).
9. United States Environment Protection Agency. Integrated Risk Information System. Available at: https://iris.epa.gov/AtoZ/?list_type=alpha (Accessed 14.01.2025).
10. Gallicchio V.S., Harper J. Role of heavy metals in the incidence of human cancers. Heavy metals – their environmental impacts and mitigation. Eds.: M. Nazal, H. Zhao. IntechOpen, 2021. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/76911 (Accessed 14.01.2025).
