Application of the radiation equivalence principle to estimation of levels of radiological protection of the population: risk-oriented approach

«Radiation and Risk», 2018, vol. 27, No. 3, pp.9-23

DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2018-27-3-9-23

Authors

Ivanov V.K.1,2 – Deputy Director, Chairman of RSCRP, Corresponding Member of RAS. A. Tsyb MRRC, Medinfo LLC, Obninsk.
Chekin S.Yu.1,2 – Head of Lab. A. Tsyb MRRC, Medinfo LLC, Obninsk. Contacts: 4 Korolev str., Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia, 249036. Tel.: (484) 399-30-79; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
Menyajlo A.N.1,2 – Senior Researcher, C. Sc., Biol. A. Tsyb MRRC, Medinfo LLC, Obninsk.
Maksioutov M.A.1,2 – Head of Dep., C. Sc., Tech. A. Tsyb MRRC, Medinfo LLC, Obninsk.
Tumanov K.А.1,2 – Head of Lab., C. Sc., Biol. A. Tsyb MRRC, Medinfo LLC, Obninsk.
Kashcheeva P.V.1,2 – Senior Researcher, C. Sc., Biol. A. Tsyb MRRC, Medinfo LLC, Obninsk.
Lovachev S.S.1,2 – Research Assistant. A. Tsyb MRRC, Medinfo.
Adamov E.O.3,4 – Research Advisor, Project PRORYV Advisor, D. Sc., Tech. N. Dollezhal Power Engineering Research and Design Institute, Innovation and Technology Center for the PRORYV, Moscow.
Lopatkin A.V.3,4 – Deputy Director, D. Sc., Tech. N. Dollezhal Power Engineering Research and Design Institute, Innovation and Technology Center for the PRORYV, Moscow.

Abstract

The present concept of the development of nuclear energy is based on the use of fast nuclear reactors with closed nuclear fuel cycle and new technologies, ensuring nuclear safety and radiological protection of present and future generations of people and the environment from ionizing radiation. For these purposes it is important to keep the natural radiation balance, it means that in some time the total radiotoxicity of the spent nuclear fuel will not exceed the total radiotoxicity of natural raw uranium ore. In this connection it is necessary to adhere to the radiation equivalence principle that allows estimation of levels of radiological protection of the population while storing spent nuclear fuel. The article presents methods for calculation of the decay time of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in the compliance with the radiation equivalence principle. The first method is based on the comparison of committed effective doses from SNF and natural uranium and, the second method is based on comparison of corresponding lifetime attributable radiation risks calculated for the Russian population. The decay time of spent nuclear fuel from the BREST and VVER reactors is calculated. The following main results are obtained. The committed effective dose from internal exposure to various radionuclides is a rough indicator of possible radiation risk and potential radiotoxicity of the radionuclides. While adhering to the radiation equivalence principle, the use of the committed effective dose as a measure of potential radiotoxicity is acceptable, because this approach overestimates the necessary decay time of SNF as compared with potential radiotoxicity estimate based on life-time attributive risk. Radiotoxicity of SNF from VVER is higher than radiotoxicity of SNF from BREST. The maximum difference in lifetime attributable risks from exposure to VVER SNF and BREST SNF will be when the decay of spent fuel time is 100 years on average, the difference is higher for women than for men.

Key words
Internal exposure, equivalent dose, committed effective dose, lifetime attributable risk, natural uranium, spent nuclear fuel, radioactive waste, radiation equivalence principle, Russian population, radiation risk models, dose coefficients.

References

1. State Policy Fundamentals of the Russian Federation in the Field of Nuclear and Radiation Safety up to 2025 (approved by the Order of the President of the Russian Federation on March 1, 2012, No. Pr-539). GARANT.RU Informative and lawful portal, official website. Available at: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70190228/ (Accessed 20.06.2018). (In Russian).

2. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources. International Basic Safety Standards, GSR Part 3 (Interim), General Safety Requirements. Vienna, IAEA, 2011. 311 p. (In Russian).

3. Radiation safety standards (RSS-99/2009). Sanitary-epidemiological rules and standards. SP2.6.1.252309. Moscow, Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2009. 100 p. (In Russian).

4. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2014 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow, Р. Hertsen MORI, 2016. 250 p. (In Russian).

5. Adamov E.O., Dzhalavyan A.V., Lopatkin A.V., Molokanov N.A., Muravyov E.V., Orlov V.V., Kalуakin S.G., Rachkov V.I., Troyanov V.M., Avrorin E.N., Ivanov V.B., Aleksakhin R.M. Conceptual framework of a strategy for the development of nuclear power in Russia to 2100. Atomnaya energiya – Atomic Energy, 2012, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 319-330. (In Russian).

6. Adamov E.O., Ganev I.Kh. Environmentally pure nuclear power. Moscow, N. Dollezhal PERDI, 2007. 145 p. (In Russian).

7. Radiation-equivalent treatment of radioactive waste. Technical reference 01.2017 NRRE. Supervisor of RE A.V. Lopatkin. (In Russian).

8. ICRP, 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4).

9. ICRP, 2012. Compendium of Dose Coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60. ICRP Publication 119. Ann. ICRP 41 (Suppl.).

10. Eckerman K.F., Leggett R.W., Nelson C.B., Puskin J.S., Richardson A.C.B. Federal Guidance Report 13. Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides. EPA 402-C-99-001. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Office of radiation and indoor air United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, 1999.

11. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2006 Report Vol. I, Annex A: Epidemiological studies of radiation and cancer. New York, United Nation, 2008.

12. ICRP Database of Dose Coefficients: Workers and Members of the Public; Ver. 3.0, official website. Available at: http://www.icrp.org/page.asp?id=145 (Accessed 20.06.2018).

Full-text article (in Russian)