Assessment of radioecological impact from prospective geological disposal facility of radioactive waste within an operational period

«Radiation and Risk», 2014, vol. 23, No. 3, pp.115-126

Authors

Sazykina T.G. – Lead. Researcher, D. Sc., Phys.-Math., Federal State Budgetary Institution "Research and Production Association "Typhoon", Obninsk, Russia.
Kryshev I.I. – Main Researcher, D. Sc., Phys.-Math., Prof., Federal State Budgetary Institution "Research and Production Association "Typhoon", Obninsk, Russia. Contacts: 4 Pobeda str., Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia, 249038. Tel.: (484) 397-16-89; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Abstract

Potential radiation doses to humans and biota were estimated from a prospective radioactive waste (RW) geological disposal in the vicinity of Mining and Chemical Combine (Zheleznogorsk, Siberia, Russia). Operational phase of the disposal filling with highly radioactive wastes is considered as critical period with highest potential impact on humans and the environment than comparing with a post-closure period. Atmospheric releases of radionuclides from ventilation systems of the open geological RW disposal facility are expected to be a main source of radiation impact on the local population and the environment. Doses to local population and reference non-human biota in the vicinity of disposal facility were calculated for different scenarios of facility operation. Three scenarios of potential atmospheric releases from open disposal facility were calculated depending on disposal material: spent nuclear fuel and irradiated graphite; spent fuel without graphite; vitrified radioactive waste. For the most conservative scenario, estimated doses to local population from atmospheric releases did not exceed 0.01 mSv/year with major contributions from 14C, 3H and 222Rn (distance from the facility >500 m); technogenic doses to reference biota did not exceed 0.05 microGy/h that was below radiation background levels. Results of radioecological assessment demonstrate low levels of technogenic exposures of local population and the environment in the vicinity of prospective geological disposal of radioactive wastes (near Zheleznogorsk, Siberia). Conclusion was made that radioecological situation in the local area of the RW geological facility during its operation period is expected to be normal both for humans and the environment.

Key words
Radioecological impact, radioactive waste, geological disposal, operational period, scenario of release of radionuclides, scenario of impact on humans, environment, dose, carbon-14, tritium, radon, biota.

References

1. Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. Biosphere analyses for the safety assessment SR-Site – synthesis and summary of results. Technical Report TR-10-09. SKB, 2010. 163 p.

2. Anderson E.B., Belov S.V., Kamnev E.N., Kolesnikov I.Yu., Lobanov N.F., Morozov V.N., Tatarinov V.N. Podzemnaya izolyatsiya radioaktivnykh otkhodov. S.-Peterburg, 2011. 558 p. (In Russian).

3. Development of a Comprehensive Plan for Scientific Research, Exploration, and Design: Creation of a Underground Radioactive Waste Isolation Facility at the Nizhnekansky Rock Massif. Ed. Jardine L.J. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Report UCRL-TR-213167. Livermore, CA, USA, 2005. 476 p. Available at: https//e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/321359.pdf (accessed July 15, 2014).

4. European Commission. EURATOM Project GASNET «A Thematic Network on Gas Issues in Safety As-sessment of Deep Repositories for Radioactive Waste». Final Report. EUR, 2003. 49 p.

5. Geological disposal: generic operational environmental safety assessment. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, NDA report NDA/RWMD/029, 2010. 74 p.

6. Gayko V.B., Korablev N.A., Solov'ev E.N., Trosheva T.I., Shamov V.P. Obrazovanie i vybros 14S na atomnykh elektrostantsiyakh s reaktorom RBMK. M.: TsNIIAtominform, 1986. 12 p. (In Russian).

7. Inventory and characteristics of spent nuclear fuel, high-level radioactive waste and other materials. US DOE, 2008.71 p.

8. Initial radiological assessment methodology – part 2 methods and input data. Science Report: SC030162/SR2. Bristol, Environment Agency, 2006. 236 p.

9. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 108. Environmental Protection: the Con-cept and Use of Reference Animals and Plants. Annals of the ICRP. Elsevier Ltd, 2009. 251 p.

10. Effects of radiation on the environment. UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. Volume II, Scientific Annex E. Effect of ionizing radiation on non-human biota. United Nations, New York, 2011. 164 p.

11. Kryshev I.I., Sazykina T.G. Radiatsionnaya bezopasnost' okruzhayushchey sredy: neobkhodimost' garmo-nizatsii rossiyskikh i mezhdunarodnykh normativno-metodicheskikh dokumentov s uchetom trebovaniy federal'nogo zakonodatel'stva i novykh mezhdunarodnykh osnovnykh norm bezopasnosti ONB-2011 [Radiation safety of the environment: request for harmonization of Russian and international regulation documents with consideration of Federal laws and new International Basic Safety Standards]. Radiatsiya i risk – Radiation and Risk, 2013, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47-61. (in Russian).

12. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Draft report ICRP ref 4838-8963-9177). Radiological Protection in Geological Disposal of Long-Lived Solid Radioactive Waste. ICRP. Elsevier Ltd, 2011. 55 p.

Full-text article (in Russian)